Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: needmorePaine
Over the years, the main argument I have heard against homeschooling has been “socialization.” Anti-homeschoolers can’t argue results because homeschoolers perform as well or better than their public school peers, so they attach that stigma of homeschoolers being sheltered and anti-social. Then I remember what socialization meant when I went to school (cliques, bullying, fights in the halls, disruptive students, etc.), and I just laugh at their argument.

For socialization, there's after school activities like 4H, scouting, etc. Plus hanging out with neighborhood kids.

My area has after-school sports organized under the township rather than the school, so any resident child can join the softball and soccer teams.

You also have homeschool groups, where the homeschool kids of an area can do field trips, do plays, etc.

28 posted on 01/23/2017 9:27:07 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

When confronted with the question, “what about socialization?” I would respond with a list of extracurricular activities we were involved in and the comment, “if he were any more socialized, we wouldn’t have time to do school.”
My family are now second generation homeschoolers. Our daughter home schools her children and our son sends his to a classical Christian hybrid school, where as well as full day students, some attend only half days and homeschooled the rest of their subjects. That’s a great concept for students whose parents don’t feel confident enough to teach every subject.


61 posted on 01/23/2017 11:44:22 AM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson