[dragnet2]

#19 Altamont, and it didn't turn out so well. One guy got killed

You never had an argument, only ignorant statements by you like the one above.

You're the one made the reckless comment above, suggesting it would have been better off if the Angels had not stopped the lunatic with a gun in front of the stage.

Would you have rather seen the gunman lay waste to half a dozen innocents which would have undoubtedly caused mass panic in the big crowd? ☺

[Old Teufel Hunden]

"You never had an argument, only ignorant statements by you like the one above."

Wrong again as usual, see my post #63. I talked at length in it about why Altamont did not turn out so well. All of which led up to the killing.

"You're the one made the reckless comment above, suggesting

There you go again, with that magic word, suggesting. So again, you read into my statement what you want to hear, not what I said. I said one guy got killed, not murdered. Murdered would mean that the Hell's Angels committed a crime. The fact is, that the Hells Angels were drunk, had engaged in numerous violent acts (as discussed in post #63) including throwing this guy around. This all contributed to the culmination in the shooting. They were not legally responsible, but they certainly have moral culpability in what happened. So yeah, when a guy gets killed, I still stand by the statement, that is an event that didn't turn out well.