Posted on 01/17/2017 9:54:22 AM PST by Kaslin
There are rumblings that anti-Trump protestors are going to cause trouble as Donald Trump takes the oath of office to become the 45th president of the United States. Well, 5,000 members of Bikers for Trump are vowing to form a wall to block these shenanigans, according to the group’s founder on Fox and Friends this week (via The Hill):
Chris Cox, the founder of the pro-Trump group, said the bikers will ride to Washington, D.C., and attend President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration on Friday.
“In the event we are needed, we certainly will form a wall of meat,” Cox said.
“We’ll be shoulder-to-shoulder with our brothers and toe-to-toe with anyone that is going to break through and police barriers,” Cox added.
Cox added that he has the utmost confidence in the DC Metro Police, the Park Police, and the Capitol Police to maintain order, but said that should a situation arise where progressives can’t behave themselves and might be a threat to public safety—they’ll be there to protect bystanders in a non-violent manner, hence the “wall of meat” remark.
Nevertheless, he said that the group is expecting a peaceful transition of power.
Bikers have such a great track record as security./s
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-altamont-festival-brings-the-1960s-to-a-violent-end
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qTKsylrpsg
They got their own heavies, teamster’s union boys and such.
So now you resort to insults after you can’t build up a straw man on me. Good job, way to lose the argument. Read what I say, not what you are implying so you can make your argument.
Y’all going or just gonna form the ‘outer perimeter’.
Would be nice to get the ‘right’ people out of DC, then form a ring around it and build a wall with no gates or bridges etc. and let all the malcontents figure it out.
I forget, didn’t you take part in some of the Funeral ‘security’?
I wish we could.
Himself just had surgery and is down for a week.
So...I’ll just live vicariously.
I have been to biker funerals and twice, had to toss out an undesirable.
Nothing official...they were my friends and a freak wanted to start crap.
Actually, I didn’t toss him.
I went to my friends and pointed and said “Get rid of him” and like magic, he was gone.
Good point!
Sorry, I just posted what I was thinking when I posted it. There are a lot of reasons people have pointed out to me why this will be just fine.
I was simply speaking from the observations I’ve made over the decades when non-trained people attempt to exercise authority in situations where tempers may be hot and conflict may be highly desirable by one side.
However, there are particulars here (the are only confronting those that get past the police, and many are ex-military who are actually trained) that significantly reduce risk.
Regarding motives, there is a difference between a comment thrown out on a forum and an article written by a paid writer.
I agree.
i.e. the whole situation is rife with risk.
“Using security that is not professionally trained is a recipe for disaster,.......”
While I agree with your statement, at least they will have very little restraint(s) to get their point across. In the old days, not having such non-restraints were highly effective.
I went to my friends and pointed and said “Get rid of him” and like magic, he was gone.
= = = = = = = = = = =
I got a feeling there gonna be a lot of that for a bit...
Sorry about ‘He’, anything serious or just a tune up?
Oh, on the Funerals I was referring to the Bad Rev from the Midwest. When certain people started to ‘ride shotgun’ the crap slowed down.
Well, best of luck, still up there in your little bit of heaven off 68 or thereabouts?. Nice country through there. Just to many Libs in MD to suit me....HA
Love these guys!
It's not an insult. You most definitely implied and suggested it did not turn out well because the lunatic in front of the stage with the gun was stopped. Then you attempted to deny this. Isn't that the same type of tactics used by the lying left?
Btw, as long as someone continues to post to me, yet fails to admit they made inaccurate or false comments or inaccurate implications after clearly losing the argument, I'll continue to help them dig their hole.
Actually, by calling me slow yes you were attempting to insult me. I don’t know of anyone that is called slow and takes it as a compliment. Then by “reading into” what I said and not actually reading what I said you build a straw man and tear that down. This would be a type of tactic that the lying left uses so perhaps you should look in the mirror.
“One guy got killed... “
Who was aiming a gun at Mick Jagger when he was on the stage
You were wrong and ya couldn’t even admit it, and then repeatedly ignored or evaded legitimate questions over and over. So you’re either a slow thinking individual, or a very disingenuous person.
Anyone can read back. Learn the difference between personal attacks and the facts. That way ya won’t appear to be a know nothing fool.
As long as you’re enjoying yourself, then, have at it.
;D
I’m glad those guys are on our side
cane swords? cans of spam to throw on violent mooselimbs, maybe a little Virginia ham too..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.