I have no idea what a “Wikipdiaphile” is, but I do believe that you are a douche of the highest order for involving yourself in this conversation.
So, since you have demonstrated an hard-on to involve yourself, please explain what exactly a “Wikipdiaphile” is and how you believe yourself to label me as such, and prove to the entire FR forum that you are not simply a mindless jackwagon running to defend “sargon” because you are the “middle-man” on his 3-man anal sex team.
Lord Almighty have mercy and defend us from such “do-gooders”.
I sincerely dislike jerks that feel compelled to involve themselves in matters, conversations, discussions or heated arguments that don’t concern them.
What are you, a liberal control freak? Can’t two people have a disagreement without an a$$hat like you trying to moderate it to your satisfaction?
You are not partner the conversation. Stay out of it and keep you “internet-phile” language out of it.
Thqnk you for you cooperation, Idiot.
.
I’ll try to put it down at your level.
Wikipedia is a trove of opinion, not facts.
When you foist that site upon us as an authority on anything but contempt for reason, you belittle the forum.
If that was your intent, (which appears probable from your ignorant, arrogant tone) Then three Nancy Pelosis and four Barack obamas to you.
.
.
BTW, everything posted to a forum is posted to all.
.