Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crz; Lorianne
LS made the interesting point that when the US under James K. Polk took possession of what is now the US Southwest, it was not actually taking possession from Mexico. Although Mexico considered that it inherited a valid claim to the land from the Spanish, the indigenous tribes had never accepted the authority of the Spanish or the Mexican governments. And, de facto, the tribes had been able to keep Mexico from exerting effective control there.

Thus it was the US, with its army and its railroads and its European immigrants which conquered that land. Not Mexico, and not Spain. Spain’s title was recognized in Europe, but its writ never ran on the ground. Again, the difference between the Spanish approach of taking over an existing (even wealthy) civilization and exploiting it, and the English, later US, approach of taking over land via ownership by farmers imported from Europe. Just sending in an army worked to exploit an existing civilization; it took farmers to provide a sufficient base of support for sufficient soldiers to conquer and hold wilderness.


37 posted on 01/13/2017 1:29:08 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: LS

Ping to #37 above.


38 posted on 01/13/2017 1:30:43 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

It all started with Texas. Later, after the dust settled, it even concerned the Lincoln administration so much that they had Grant send Sheridan to the border with arms for the republican forces, at which time the French decided they didnt want anything to do with fighting which might involve ourselves.

Grant scoffed at the whole thing. He states in his civil war memiors that it was the royalty in europe who were the prime instigators in the whole affair at that time. After all, they were all cousins.

If you read the rolls of the euro troops in Mexico, there were a couple other countries who had provided troops also.

I often wonder if there was a war with France over Mexico at that point just after our civil war, how fast would we have beat the hell out of them. I know one thing, it wouldnt have been pretty since our troops were experienced veterans.


42 posted on 01/13/2017 4:13:51 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Exactly. In fact, Moses Austin was invited to settle specifically to have white (new) “Mexian citizens” pacify the land & secure it from Indians.


44 posted on 01/13/2017 10:03:38 PM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Comancheria vs the Second United States Cavalry


47 posted on 01/16/2017 4:00:22 PM PST by Pelham (the refusal to Deport is defacto Amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson