Why would Obama appoint Schwartz in Jan. 2009, when he was already appointed by Bush in 2008.
That would suggest that the appointment typically extends to the end of a presidential term.
If that is the case, then this story is a big nothing.
Why would Obama appoint Schwartz in Jan. 2009, when he was already appointed by Bush in 2008.
That would suggest that the appointment typically extends to the end of a presidential term.
If that is the case, then this story is a big nothing.
BINGO!
Thanks for making sense.