Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyPilot

Thanks for that. I don’t remember hearing anything about a challenge to Ford’s pardon of Nixon but then everyone was SICK AND TIRED OF THE WHOLE DAMN AFFAIR back then and I don’t know what coverage that got on the news. Plus there was no internet. I still hold to the fact that Nixon had been accused of a crime and Hillary hasn’t so there is nothing to pardon her for.

“Under the Constitution, the president may pardon only persons convicted or accused of federal crimes and offenses prosecuted by the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States in the D.C.”

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentandcabinet/fl/Presidential-Pardons-Legal-Guidelines.htm

Where has she been formally accused?


79 posted on 01/13/2017 3:42:43 AM PST by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: MagnoliaB

I am not a lawyer, but I believe from all that I have read, that she does not have to be formally accused or charged. And the very fact that President Ford’s pardon of Nixon has been accepted as legal is really all that the precedent requires. The bottom line is this: if Obama pardons Hillary - that’s it. End game. You and I won’t like it, but that’s the way it is.


137 posted on 01/13/2017 7:21:39 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson