One who watched stories about the case on Fox News, which did not disclose that it has the same corporate parent as the publisher whose insurance would have paid the judgement, might be under that impression, and wrong.
“One who watched stories about the case on Fox News, which did not disclose that it has the same corporate parent as the publisher whose insurance would have paid the judgement, might be under that impression, and wrong.”
I’ll take the word of the attorneys that had her on the hook for $1.3 million since her insurance company claimed they had a limit on damages to be paid.
Don’t be such a naïve little kid that thinks just because an insurance company is involved anything and everything is covered. It isn’t. There are limits to all insurance coverages. Chances are you have the minimum auto insurance coverage, not knowing that if you hit that expensive vehicle you might not be completely covered and are on the hook for the remaining balance. That’s right...go check.
P.S. I don’t watch Fox. Such a juvenile try at an insult, kid.