Yeah I am new to posting here but I have been reading FR for many years. When I first posted a couple of things one long timer PMed me about not doing the research about what I was going to post. That was great advice. So now before I post something despite the initial desire because it fits the way I think I pause and do some research. In this case I was going to post that the article referenced did not provide any details. I went and found the original article and being a Monica fan I read it almost looking for the bias. But page after page of side by side nearly direct copying got me shaking my head. I do hope there is a good explanation or Monica stands up and owns it but it does provide fodder for the libtards to attack.
Appreciate the attention to detail and reasoned comment. Thanks.
CNN is hardly research, it is part of the problem in plagiarism. When CNN ignores the vast plagiarism of Hillary and Obama, the scandal of Obama repeating like a robot material he never thought off a teleprompter, and the huge amount of material the media and the Obamas got written for them by foreign paper makers, one can only conclude that plagiarism affects such news companies as CNN and is a vast problem in a trolling liberal land.