To: Eagle Forgotten
39 posted on
01/04/2017 7:45:16 PM PST by
Drago
To: Drago
I said that, instead of complete repeal, the GOP "could keep some of the deficit-reducers" in Obamacare. The article you linked agrees with that statement.
The CNBC explanation appears to be correct as to the specific matter that Rand Paul was voting on. My impression is that it was to pave the way for total repeal, which would increase the deficit. Paul's point seems to be that he doesn't want a deficit increase now with a possibility of reduction later (a reduction that would come if they re-enact some parts of Obamacare).
That Conservative Review article you linked is very informative about what kind of betrayal we should watch for from the Republicans in Congress.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson