If they dont appoint someone whos really good, were going to oppose him tooth and nail, the minority leader said. They wont have 60 votes to put in an out-of-the-mainstream nominee.
Schumer says Democrats will filibuster Supreme court nominees.
1 posted on
01/04/2017 6:53:30 AM PST by
detective
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: detective
Dems got away with BORK and tried to do it with Thomas, they will do anything... Time to make sure Republicans get 8 more seats in 18.
To: detective
I’m sure the media will be apoplectic over Schumer not giving the President a vote. LOL
3 posted on
01/04/2017 6:55:54 AM PST by
1Old Pro
To: detective
You go for it, Chuck. Please.
4 posted on
01/04/2017 6:56:04 AM PST by
SoFloFreeper
(Isaiah 25:8)
To: detective
I hope Schumer is prepared to get schlonged.
To: detective
And by “mainstream” I can only assume he means very far left.
To: detective
Not going to need 60 votes. Just 51 thanks to dingy harry.
10 posted on
01/04/2017 6:58:46 AM PST by
ealgeone
To: detective
11 posted on
01/04/2017 6:59:10 AM PST by
b4its2late
(A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
To: detective
Won’t work. Nuclear option gone on this.
12 posted on
01/04/2017 6:59:16 AM PST by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
To: detective
“Really good” to a dim-bulb-crat means that they can read at the fifth grade level and have a driver’s license, and most important - they are naive liberals with no perception of reality,
To: detective
Nuke option used repeatedly by democrats.
Besides that, I’ve never believed in the filibuster.
16 posted on
01/04/2017 7:00:57 AM PST by
xzins
(Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
To: detective
Shut up schmucky
You guys changed the rules so you can’t do anything
Now we just need to figure out a way to make the “wise latina” and fatass dyke retire. Is impeachment a possibility if they make up their own rules?
17 posted on
01/04/2017 7:00:57 AM PST by
Mr. K
( Trump kicked her ass 2-to-1 if you remove all the voter fraud.)
To: detective
Nuke option used repeatedly by democrats.
Besides that, I’ve never believed in the filibuster.
18 posted on
01/04/2017 7:00:57 AM PST by
xzins
(Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
To: detective
Let's see that fight. Trump needs to be tested early. Let's find out once and for all whether he can beat Schumer at his game.
-PJ
20 posted on
01/04/2017 7:01:23 AM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: detective
In four years, the next who are likely to retire/die are Ginsberg, Kennedy and Breyer. We can go with 7 or 6. Eventually it might be a problem when we are down to Alito, Roberts, Kagan and Sotomayor.
21 posted on
01/04/2017 7:01:39 AM PST by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: detective
And does this surprise anyone?
To: detective
The welcoming spirit of cooperation is just awesome isn’t it. Didn’t the lyin’ king get most of his appointments within the first 9 or 10 days? Smooth transition of power my rosy red.................
27 posted on
01/04/2017 7:05:04 AM PST by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: detective
Asked if he would do his best to hold the seat open, Schumer responded, Absolutely. Hey Schmucky, meet President Trump...
![](http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02689/taksim_2689434b.jpg)
28 posted on
01/04/2017 7:07:52 AM PST by
COBOL2Java
(1 Tim 2:1-3)
To: detective
Schumer bluffing to get in the news.
With GOP in control, the Senate could be sure to go into official recess and allow Trump a recess appointment that might be even less to the Schumer-McCain wing’s liking and let the next election have a voice.
29 posted on
01/04/2017 7:08:43 AM PST by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: detective
Elections have consequences.
32 posted on
01/04/2017 7:11:40 AM PST by
Lopeover
(The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
To: detective
The upcoming electoral map for the Senate doesn’t support this type of action. There are 33 seats up for grabs next election, and only 8 are currently Republican. Many of the Dem seats are in states that Trump won easily. If those Senators obstruct Trump, they are likely to lose those seats. I don’t think Schmuck with be able to drum up the votes for blocking nominees.
33 posted on
01/04/2017 7:11:53 AM PST by
ibheath
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson