“Her first question for the first debate does not give her much wiggle room. “
So, you don’t think it’s appropriate for a presidential candidate accused by multiple women of harassment, or worse, to be asked about it? Should Slick Willie not have been asked to respond to his accusers? It was an entirely legitimate question, IMO.
“So, you don’t think it’s appropriate for a presidential candidate accused by multiple women of harassment, or worse, to be asked about it? Should Slick Willie not have been asked to respond to his accusers? It was an entirely legitimate question, IMO.”
A. Megyn’s question had NOTHING to do with accusations of harassment (”or worse”). It had to do with “several disparaging comments about women’s looks” on Trump’s Twitter account, which, to Megyn’s teeny little feminist brain, meant Trump was part of the “war on women.”
B. And, no, accusations do not always have to be dignified with an answer - or even a question - particularly accusations made out of the blue in the middle of a political campaign.
“So, you don’t think it’s appropriate for a presidential candidate accused by multiple women of harassment, or worse, to be asked about it?”
You mean, you think that the fact that they waited for years, in most cases, and only brought it up merely days before the election, and that most of it was discredited immediately, and that the MSM did not parade the discrediting — that is still legitimate to you?
I forgot — the one he called a pig, etc., she started it and called him much worse initially.