You said that he was a child molester, not that he was molested when he was a child. Also, why should a victim of a sexual crime have to 'ADMIT' to it, as you so revealingly state? Or do you perceive a man to be diminished as a man because he was sexually abused by a man when he was a (non-consenting) child?
It is clearly incorrect to state that ALL gay men are paedophiles, but I don't expect you to have the integrity to acknowledge that fact.
"Have you considered that he might have wished to be heterosexual? ... Do you have any evidence to support that allegation?"
Well he started off as a straight man (check his Wikipedia entry) and seems to have become exclusively gay in middle age. He obviously tried to pursue sexual relationships with women in his early adulthood, but it did not work out.
"Wait a minute....you're not a packer are you?"
No. I am not gay, as I already told the other Westboro Baptist Church bigot. I simply find it reprehensible that you and your hate-filled associates feel the need to insult a man shortly after his death and dismiss his philanthropic efforts just because he was gay. (However, I realise that genuine altruism is a concept you will have some difficulty understanding.)
No, they're not...but neither do those non-pederasts speak out loudly against those who are.
Also note that not all who were molested as boys turned out to be queer, but they're still messed up.
why should a victim of a sexual crime have to 'ADMIT' to it, as you so revealingly state?
Well, 20% of them don't. I guess they're proud of being queer (gay pride).
I already told the other Westboro Baptist Church bigot.
Big talk coming from a heterophobic bigot.
Although the intolerant hater faggots make up only 1 to 3% of the population, they have infested and corrupted practically every segment of our culture, from the media, to the military, to the churches (yes, including the Catholic Church) They first demanded to be accepted, then treated as equal, now they are exercising the attempt to completey dominate the culture...especially "education" where they can now easily harvest our children.
I'd say that none of them are.
I don't expect you to have the integrity to acknowledge that fact.
Why not, you're technically correct. A pedo is attracted to children. Why would any self-respecting rump ranger be interested in little girls?
However, they do have a high incidence of pederasty. (boy-raping)