Typical MSM lame writeup, which fails to mention that Congress would have final approval of such an interstate compact.
1 posted on
12/23/2016 1:46:31 PM PST by
dirtboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: dirtboy
If ever....how they shall rue the day with gnashing of teeth.
2 posted on
12/23/2016 1:48:09 PM PST by
dasboot
(GOV POLICY: From each according to our needs; to each according to our needs.)
To: dirtboy
Democrats have absolute control in six states.
This won’t be a large movement.
Remember when there was talk of them hijacking the Electoral College vote? Pfft!
Republicans are in absolute control of 25 states.
More tantrums from the kings of tantrum.
3 posted on
12/23/2016 1:50:40 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(jcon40, "Are we be coming into the age of Sanity?")
To: dirtboy
It’s hard to maintain a Republic. 200+ years and it takes real commitment, which I fear may be sorely lacking these days
4 posted on
12/23/2016 1:51:28 PM PST by
RichardMoore
(There is only one issue Life: dump TV and follow a plant based diet)
To: Candor7
Candor7, do you know more about the actual popular vote totals? I’ve searched and can’t find anything that is current or seems half way accurate. Aside from that, has any authoritative source even mentioned or tried to figure out how many CA votes were by non-citizens?
5 posted on
12/23/2016 1:52:24 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
To: dirtboy
How novel, a scheme to disenfranchise the voters in your state. Bet that goes over well with the citizens of the states.
6 posted on
12/23/2016 1:52:46 PM PST by
w1andsodidwe
(TRUMP. He makes me smile, too.)
To: dirtboy
In states including Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Ohio and New Mexico, legislators have said they plan to introduce legislation that would require their state's Electoral College voters cast ballots for the presidential candidate who earns the most votes nationwide, regardless of the statewide results.In other words, these legislators wish to make THEIR OWN CONSTITUENTS votes subject to the will of the people of California.
7 posted on
12/23/2016 1:52:49 PM PST by
SoFloFreeper
(Isaiah 25:8)
To: dirtboy
of course we should remember that all the votes have not been counted. The don’t count the absentee votes unless they have to
9 posted on
12/23/2016 1:54:04 PM PST by
RichardMoore
(There is only one issue Life: dump TV and follow a plant based diet)
To: dirtboy
Watch that backfire on them. Then what?
10 posted on
12/23/2016 1:54:08 PM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: dirtboy
Could backfire, actually.
11 posted on
12/23/2016 1:54:56 PM PST by
Concentrate
(ex-texan was right. And Always Right was wrong, which is why we lost the election.)
To: dirtboy
A Majority of Voters REJECTED H->! for POTUS.
12 posted on
12/23/2016 1:57:33 PM PST by
Paladin2
(No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
To: dirtboy
Oh great, so California would get to decide every president for ever.
13 posted on
12/23/2016 1:58:13 PM PST by
FreedomStar3028
(Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
To: dirtboy
Connecticut State Sen. Mae Flexer and all the rest on that anti-EC bandwagon, show their stupidity and ignorance whenever they suggest an unconstitutional maneuver to help get Democrat Candidates elected; by trying (in vain) to discredit the notion of the Electoral College.
Trump/Pence MAGA!
Merry Christmas to my FReepers...
16 posted on
12/23/2016 2:01:08 PM PST by
heterosupremacist
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: dirtboy
require their state's Electoral College voters cast ballots for the presidential candidate who earns the most votes nationwide, regardless of the statewide results. I believe there will be a clause in there that says "UNLESS a Republican earns the most votes nationwide"
17 posted on
12/23/2016 2:01:39 PM PST by
Mark
(Celebrities... is there anything they do not know? -Homer Simpson)
To: dirtboy
The Electoral College is a relic of a bygone era, and we need to change this system," said Connecticut state Sen. Mae Flexer, Someone should read to Mae the portion of The Constitution that outlines the Amendment process. These home grown half-a$$ed maneuvers to get around the Constitutional requirements are going to end up in a Constitutional crisis.
18 posted on
12/23/2016 2:03:11 PM PST by
The Sons of Liberty
(Which is more believable - screaming insane libs, or the russkies?)
To: dirtboy
Once again working around things that didn’t benefit them, if zippy the a##clown or canckles did it it would be fine
To: dirtboy
"Every vote in this country should have equal weight. The Electoral College is a relic of a bygone era, and we need to change this system," said Connecticut state Sen. Mae Flexer, who filed a bill with several fellow Democrats requiring Connecticut to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Well then, that shall give the states which don't agree the right to succeed, necessarily. That's the whole idea of the electoral college in the first place.
21 posted on
12/23/2016 2:04:05 PM PST by
Concentrate
(ex-texan was right. And Always Right was wrong, which is why we lost the election.)
To: dirtboy
First, we have to cleanse all of the illegal votes out of th Democrat Party!!!
25 posted on
12/23/2016 2:12:04 PM PST by
JLAGRAYFOX
(Defeat both the Republican (e) & Democrat (e) political parties....Forever!!!)
To: dirtboy
Typical MSM lame writeup, which fails to mention that Congress would have final approval of such an interstate compact. Even more stupid for the butthurt Democrat snowflakes to make it an interstate deal. There is nothing in the Constitution that details how the individual states have to determine their votes. If each state, INDIVIDUALLY, decided to use the "total nation vote winner gets our electoral votes", I can't see how anyone could stop them.
As soon as they develop and sign a pact among states, however, it would probably be shot down in the courts as patently unconstitutional. At worst, the interstate part of it would move it into the realm of the Federal government, whatever that would do to things.
26 posted on
12/23/2016 2:12:51 PM PST by
ssaftler
(January 20, 2017: Morning in America)
To: dirtboy
All this after-the-fact hand wringing about the “national popular vote” is more leftist BS to attempt to de-legitimize Trump’s victory. I’m so sick of these people.
And isn’t there an equal protection issue wrapped up in this? I vote for Trump, e.g., in a state that goes for Trump - but instead my vote is effectively voided if Clinton wins the “national popular vote” and my state is part of the compact. Seems profoundly unconstitutional.
To: dirtboy
Some forms of stupid can’t be fixed
32 posted on
12/23/2016 2:17:51 PM PST by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson