Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Just maybe the writer for Newsmax and the writer for
Breitbart are just as ignorant about Limbaugh’s history
as you. And, you and the Newsmax/Breitbart writers can’t
explain why so many Cruz fans claimed Limbaugh was in
the tank for Trump from the onset of the campaign.
Further, if Limbaugh is so anti Trump then why is he
spending so much of his program defending him now?

Now, here is a factoid you should come to grips with.
If you’re going to hate Limbaugh then hate him for
valid reasons. He sticks up for all levels of
conservatives against liberal attacks and he will
stick up for a conservative when he thinks they
have been attacked unfairly by a fellow conservative.

Limbaugh has never seen his job as picking one
candidate in the primaries and sticking with that
candidate. I don’t give a shit what Breitbart or
Newsmax says. None of those young punks has listened
as long as I have. If you let your common sense take
over for a minute you would understand that from a
business standpoint it doesn’t make sense for Rush
to piss off so much of his target audience. No
way in the world for Limbaugh to play all sides
against the middle and get away with it for over
thirty years. Tell me who is holding his feet
to the fire for all the hateful things he said
about Trump during the primary season?


108 posted on 12/24/2016 11:10:29 AM PST by Sivad (NorCal red turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Sivad
Really, so Rush DIDN'T endorse Ted Cruz as THE candidate that you've gotta pick because he's the closest thing to Ronald Reagan in our lifetime? That was all a lie, that's your story? Here's the link, chief: "Ted Cruz is THE guy"

By the way, I don't give a fat crap how long you've been listening to Rush. To keep breaking that out is LAME. Don't even bother with another of your lame-assed replies, we're done and I just caught you in a major lie.

As for Rush being pro-Trump, that was only after Cruz was out. What's he going to do, go endorse the same Clinton that he's been rightfully trashing for the last 25 years? But you know all of this, you've been listening to him since his KFBK Sacramento days. The fact is, Rush lost a lot of his audience because he knowingly endorsed the more liberal candidate that is soft on illegal-immigration. He's a billionaire (or darn near) it, so he'll be fine broadcasting to livestock and living off his past profits. On the other hand, Rush's partner-in-crime Mark Levin will not survive, nor should he. He'll be gone by Labor Day.

109 posted on 12/26/2016 1:40:15 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson