[trebb]

The value of a generalization depends on the degree it is generally true.

Your generalization fails because it is the rare man who would protect a pedophile.

Yep - such generalization is what the Left does - disheartening to see it here - of course they have their 'rationale" about why saying men and men cops support pedophiles - must be all men and cops are pedophiles at heart (or, homosexuals are representative of men and cops.....).

[ROCKLOBSTER]

must be all men and cops are pedophiles at heart (or, homosexuals are representative of men and cops.....)

Nope, just plenty of politicians, Hollyweirdos, "educators", media hacks, bureaucrats, and enough priests, coaches, Boy Scout leaders and other "youth leaders".

That's where they're concentrated, especially government.

Any RAT pol who isn't queer, is either some other kind of perv, or an enabler.

Why else do you think they universally oppose any "sex offender" reform legislation?

[Jeff Chandler]

must be all men and cops are pedophiles at heart (or, homosexuals are representative of men and cops.....).

That's what's wrong with that generalization. It's generally wrong in its implication.