Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DouglasKC

Nope...article says the law does not allow for the rescinding of protection of the land, only for the granting of it.


29 posted on 12/19/2016 6:03:57 PM PST by JediJones (We must deport all liberals until we can figure out what the hell is going on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

Just disregard the law, like obama has been doing


31 posted on 12/19/2016 6:07:52 PM PST by italianquaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones
article says the law does not allow for the rescinding of protection of the land, only for the granting of it.

OTOH, since one Congress cannot bind a future one, all that needs to happen is for the next Congress to repeal the prior law. Effectively, Congress would rescind this order, and Trump would carry the recinding, based on the new law, out.

45 posted on 12/19/2016 6:46:03 PM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones

So...amend the law. Done all the time.


56 posted on 12/19/2016 7:10:34 PM PST by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of infants, ruled by their emotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson