Okay. But the reason the election went to the House in 1825 was because no one received the commensurate number of electoral votes which represented a majority at that time.
This year, from an electoral college standpoint, there are only two candidates - Trump and Clinton. No one else secured any electoral votes.
Barring an outright revolution by most of the electors, one of the two people will win the election today - and he/she will win it as soon as he/she receives his/her 270th electoral vote.
Based on the results of the voting back in November, and the current state-by state rules regarding electors, that person should be Donald Trump. And, given his lead in numbers of pledged electors, it should occur without a lot of drama - apart from that which will be manufactured by the democrats and the media after the electoral vote is certified.
Thats true. But, where/who do those votes go if they are left out if a state is tied up? Like WI and MI and PA?
I have to believe that is what they were up to.
In short, I think she thought she could “sell” her popular votes in those states to Klintoon. How much money did they pump into her recount efforts? Then, if she could get the popular vote to Klintoon and put her over the top, she thought that those electoral votes would go to Klintoon.
Wild imagination, but the question is..why in the hell would she want to recount in states that Trump won by that margin? Why not FL?
These people are twisted in their logic.
I will post tomorrow what Hillary SHOULD have done if she wanted to use the EC to defeat Trump.
No sense in doing it today. Loose lips sink ships.