He’s right. The Constitution is no fire-wall if 5 on SCOTUS making a ruling on whatever.
USSC can interpret but I don’t believe they can arbitrarily change, add or remove anything from the Constitution.
That would take convening a Constitutional Convention.
Fear of the people is a firewall against SCOTUS - or any lower court - even accepting such a case.Hillary wouldn’t even make a good test case for it, since she although she got more votes than anyone else, she didn’t win a majority of the popular vote.
In any case, SCOTUS is no more constitutional than the Electoral College is; you are talking constitutional crisis time. Not “constitutional crisis” in the sense that journalism spoke of during the latter days of the Nixon Administration, but constitutional crisis as in, well-intended patriots with guns trying to figure out who it is their duty to shoot.
“The Constitution has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it”. Lysander Spooner, No Treason (1870)