"Oooooo....Didums woos an ewection? Oh, noooooez....." 😂😜😁
If stupid hurt, we would have less of it.
#LATimesLIES
Somebody needs thier law license revoked.
I think this guy doesn’t understand the term unconstitutional. Possibly the left has some unwritten ethical guidelines that they are making up and following which is their shadow constitution. And the electoral college is not in that.
As long as it fits their agenda, the times will print any BS that comes it’s way.
Banned? Is banning in the constitution?
A person becomes a liberal (er, now “progressive”) when they decide that reality itself can be malleable and plastic, subject to their ever-changing ideas of fashion and passion.
Case in point: calling a provision of the Constitution in violation of same.
A college president with guts would fire this professor for incompetence.
The hysterical drivel from the left will continue on through the weekend, until it reaches a fevered pitch on Monday. Once the electors have voted, they should withdraw to their dark corners, lick their perceived wounds, and pout until after the first of the year.
Liberal professors and news media are reaching a new low in whinerism.
So, the EC is in the Constitution, which makes it unconstitutional, but that is no barrier to changing it.
But the Supreme Court could abolish it by fiat.
You know, Saddam Hussein did not have an entirely bad idea feeding people into his plastic shredders.
The LATimes is a fifth-column US-hating media rag that contains only leftist diarrhea.
So the slimeball Kenneth Jost and the Los Angeles Slimes moves into Insurrection and Treason.
This entire “get rid of the Electoral College” rant is perhaps the biggest example of leftist hypocrisy ever.
They bleat on incessantly about “diversity” and “disenfranchisement” and “voices being heard” at every opportunity. But the Electoral College is truly all of those things. It gives states with low populations but different needs and values a voice. And not just a voice, but a bit of power as well. It may be the best example of inclusion on a political level. Without it, three states would pick the president every time.
And they want it gone because they couldn’t win it. Waaaa!
It's obvious why this guy is adjunct and not a real professor. It's also obvious why we need real, patriotic Americans on the Supreme Court. We need eight years of President Trump, and we need him VERY carefully researching each judicial nominee, at all levels. We cannot afford any more republican nominees who flip once they are on the bench. The boldness of suggesting that the Constitution is unconstitutional is frightening; I don't think the democrats learned from 1861-1865.
Constitutional law according to Kim Jong-un
I love it when lawyers and politicians who are empowered by the US Constitution to force their opinions on us tell us the Constitution shouldn’t apply to them. :)