RE: You would think they would be interested in kissing the butt of their new boss rather than wishing to sabotage him.
Maybe, just maybe they aren’t kissing anyone’s butts but have REALLY found evidence of Russia’s attempts to hack.
The question is this — let’s say this is true. Did they hacking really change the results of the elections?
Unless they can show that the voting machines ( which are NOT networked and not connected to the internet or any LAN or WAN but STANDALONE machines ) are tampered with, the results are what they are.
If all they’re showing is Russia successfully hacked into the DNC to reveal the hidden agenda of the Democrats, hey, what’s to be surprised about?
Correct! Yet here is the Fake News spin:
“The FBI, CIA and the Office of Director of National Intelligence now all agree that Russia was behind computer hacks into U.S. political institutions”
John Podesta’s Gmail is not a political institution. It’s a private citizen.
There’s the DNC leaks, but that was exposing inner Democrat anti-Bernie material, only a small tilt toward Trump, which can never be proven anyway.
Everyone seems to be forgetting the elephant in the living room.
Think people.
Why would Russia bother with the DNC emails & Podesta’s office crap when all of the contents of the unsecured server in Hillary's basement/bathroom were ripe for the picking?
They could have sabotaged Hillary with one or 2 leaks instead of the 58,600 emails from Podesta or the 27,515 emails from the DNC.
The dems, WH & GOP-e are playing a very dangerous game using Russia as the bogeyman. The Russian bear will only take so many pokes. God help us all when Russia says no more.