Replies

You have mentioned Cashill 13 times in this thread alone to degrade our research. You call people names..
You posit the abjectly absurd.It’s ludicrous to even imagine he didn’t specify which Ann
Your own words: it’s not what you “think,”—it’s the evidence. I referenced the actual evidence. You referenced what you ‘think,’ the sensitive material entails. That’s the difference.
So we can't "think" but you can?
I, Cashill, and numerous others think Stanley Dunham looks like Obama.
Calling us liers and nasty! I see that the gossip/bully/pack mentality is back. It’s the mark of people pushing lies. The single most striking aspect of the Anna Toot cabal has always been the nastiness.
More nastiness...So ask yourself your own question. Who on earth would be influenced by a little cabal of nasty bully-gossips? The nastiness used routinely to support the Anna Toot theory is a prime indicator that it’s false. People arguing the truth use facts and evidence. People arguing a lie use personal insults.
Who is insulting who?

I could on and on....Oh one more..

Galatians 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,

Let me ask, do you celebrate Christmas?

I never called anyone a name.

It’s not a sin or any other crime to mention Cashill.

Yes, they banded together and insulted and gossiped about me. That doesn’t offend you, but me mentioning it does?