Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldSmaj

As a rule, I don’t “trust” any of them. Trust has to be earned by each individual weapon.

I’ll “trust” a piece if it gets through its first 200 round string without failure of any sort.

Owing to the need for some guns to have a “break-in” period, I’ll run the test twice more. Failing that, off to the glue-factory, you go....


58 posted on 12/11/2016 9:50:35 AM PST by papertyger (The semantics define how we think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger
As a rule, I don’t “trust” any of them. Trust has to be earned by each individual weapon.

This.

I take the reliability of subcompact pistols with a grain of salt no matter what the name. Once the size and weight of a handgun drop below a certain point, they can be right on the edge as far as reliability goes, and frequently fall over that edge if the "wrong" ammunition is used.

I have a Beretta Nano that I bought despite the bad press they were getting at the time, simply because the range had a well-used one for rent and it hooked me. I have not had any problems with it since I deemed it "broken in," but a lot of people won't even consider one.

Mr. niteowl77

61 posted on 12/11/2016 10:41:35 AM PST by niteowl77 (Don't need no Bushes. Don't need no Clintons. Don't need no fooling around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson