>>Why does it bother you that they were sitting in on the meeting? ... They are there for a reason and I’m not one who can explain why or want to. I don’t care.
*************************************************************
If you don’t care, then why are you commenting? If Freeper DJT supporters can’t even post an observation without this kind of response, that’s a sad thing.
If you re-read what I wrote, I didn’t say it “bothered” me or that it was a criticism. I said it was fine, and that it was a bit odd. It WAS odd.
After that initial reaction, I visited the Daily Mail and read that others were wondering the same thing. That others noticed too tells me it was indeed worthy of taking note of it as I did in my original post.
Again, I’m not criticizing it, not objecting to it (like, who am I to object anyway). That he MAGA is the primary focus. I simply made an observation and posted my curiosity about it.
Does anyone have an idea as to why DJT’s 3 eldest children are in attendance at this meeting? I’m trying to get a handle on what their roles are and are going to be.
They are did a super job campaigning for their dad. DJT said the two sons will run the company, with Ivanka being First Daughter and DJT says hopefully more (whatever that entails).
But right now, I am a little confused why they are attending this meeting.
791 posted on 12/14/2016, 5:26:42 PM by Right-wing Librarian********************************************
I commented to your post you directed to me. After saying the three did a good job on his campaign you were confused why they were sitting in on the meeting and that you were trying to get a handle on it.
A handle on their roles will be determined by their dad. I believe Ivanka will have a office inside the White House. I wouldn't be surprised if Melania has asked Ivanka to set up her office for when she is able to come when school is out for Barron.