People have a right to hold traditional moral views on sex and sexuality.
In the case of "traditional moslem morality" that' means throwing queers off buildings.
Then, in the very next sentence, you said:
The government should not be endorsing views inimical to many religious believers, but at most should be neutral.
"The government" thinks that the maniacal murdering moslems are "religious believers"...
So according to your exact words; You said what I said you said.
We already had them getting slaughtered in Florida....the camel-raper probably thought he had a green light.
In no way did I EVER suggest that the government should remain neutral about the inhuman barbarities of ISIS or other Islamist militants.
Well, whether you did or not, that's exactly what they've been doing.
Just go f*** yourself.
OK, I will once again try to be 100% clear. Obviously freedom of religion is not absolute if it involves giving license to murder. That was NOT in the least what I was advocating, because that was NOT the subject of discussion. The subject was the homosexual agenda and ideology that the US government is pushing, and that is what I believe religious believers have a right to object to and which the government should not endorse or at least remain neutral about. So you can continue your malicious slanderous hobby horse, but I have said all I will say on the subject.