OK, to be perfectly clear, I was talking about the entire homosexualist ideology, which is inimical to many religious believers, and pointing out the government should not be promoting it, and at most should be neutral. I said absolutely nothing to support the death penalty for homosexuals nor Moslems throwing the same off buildings. I in no way support the government’s being neutral concerning such barbarism. The topic was the homosexual agenda, not throwing homosexuals off buildings. You’re the one trying to twist my words to try to claim I was saying the government should not oppose ISIS. Actually, I would submit to you, that traditional Christian believers take a much stronger line against ISIS barbarism than the homosexualist agenda pushing liberals, who I guess rank Muslims higher than homosexuals in their hierarchy of victim status.
I didn't "twist" your words....I merely copy/pasted them...(that the government should remain neutral)
to claim I was saying the government should not oppose ISIS.
Well...You just did it again.
I was talking about the entire homosexualist ideology, which is inimical to many religious believers, and pointing out the government should not be promoting it, and at most should be neutral.
The government treats islam as though it's a religion, and to remain neutral would allow what I said....
Just like this:
Fury as watchdog says it's OK to send gay people death threats – but only if you're Muslim
(Netherlands) In a shocking move, the taxpayer-funded hotline said it would not pursue a criminal complaint over horrific messages from radical Islamists because the Koran says gay people can be killed.
... According to Dutch media advisors from the anti-discrimination bureau MiND said that, while homophobic abuse was usually a crime, it was justifiable if you were Muslim due to laws on freedom of religious expression....
They argued that the Koran says it is acceptable to kill people for being homosexual, and so death threats towards gay people from Muslims could not be discriminatory.
In a jaw-dropping email explaining why they could not take up the complaint, they wrote: “The remarks must be seen in the context of religious beliefs in Islam, which juridically takes away the insulting character."
freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3501012/posts#1