Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Democrat_media

.
You’re so far out there that you’re not worth responding to.
.


101 posted on 12/09/2016 8:02:56 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

Sorry if this is redundant.
Wow! There be Trolls out in force. Yes, maybe I be family. Answering the big question, Rosneft was a big opportunity to use Exxon technology to exploit oil reserves in the Russian Arctic. But..as you guys (likely do not know,) Exxon has written off it’s venture investment because of the sanctions.
In oil extraction, it is a simple cost vs return calculation. In the past 40 years, governments have gotten more savvy and negotiated much tighter deals. The Russian deal was advantageous to both Exxon and Rosneft, but the reserves both were looking for would be dwarfed by the potential in the US Arctic Reserve in Alaska.
Too the point of experience and qualification.. Rex Tillerson had to personally assuage the concerns of the Emir of Qatar when Exxon brought the cheapest LNG production facility in Papua New Guinea.
I knew Rex Tillerson 40 years ago, and I knew that he was destined to greatness. He is also a humble person.


132 posted on 12/10/2016 10:27:04 PM PST by calico_thompson (Vanity sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson