[Cboldt]

The Court hears Cases when Lower Courts Disregard past Supreme Court decisions

Not always. The SCOTUS allowed Federal Circuit courts to apply the Presser case for the OPPOSITE of what it waid, for decades. It did so becuase SCOTUS approved of the result.

Courts are highly political, but because of the role they have, they will deny this fact. Same idea as the press being objective. The press will deny being partisan, because it is in the press's self-interest that people believe the myth.

[Democrat_media]

Agree again.

This is a coup by Soros

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5eqg9p/red_alert_jim_stone_discovers_soros_bot_funding/

[Redwood71]

I can take it a step further. I wish that there be a separation of the feds and state laws that there be no outlet to ask for a review outside of state lines for anything that is not state responsibilities. The public thinks that the supreme court is the last step in appeals for anything and it isn’t, or shouldn’t be. And I think this case of the election question should be decided no higher than the state level because the vote is the state responsibility. The only time the feds should get involved is when it is a case of interstate violations like importing voters. And treated like interstate commerce.

I was always taught to solve a problem at the lowest level. Same should apply here.

red