To: Paladin2
"Two SCMI Justices are wimps and should no longer be considered for appointment to SCOTUS. "
Wimps? Beg your pardon, these justices recused themselves from this decision as they were on a short list named by Trump of justices to replace Justice Scalia even before the election.
These two justices also just won a state-wide election making the court a 5-2 conservative majority, even after taking themselves out of the decision - and they still knew the court would have 3-2 republican advantage.
Voting in this decision would be a direct conflict of interest as any judge with integrity would do that was on a short list as a SCOTUS nominee, unlike Sotomayer and Kagan should have done in previous cases.
60 posted on
12/09/2016 4:23:55 PM PST by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: quantim
Eye disagree.
Stein is not a possible MI POTUS winner. Judges are not supposed to be identified with a nonConstitutional outlined party. There is no reason for them to recuse.
The conflict of interest is from a Federal interference with the State's right to determine its own elector process.
S0r0$ and his puppet Stein are to be shown no mercy when it comes to the State of Michigan's representation on the Federal Level.
64 posted on
12/09/2016 4:31:45 PM PST by
Paladin2
(No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
To: quantim
"Sotomayer (Wide Latrina) and Kagan(Pure political Hack)"
were involved in previous cases on a partisan basis. The MISC judges were not so "compromised" on this issue to be brought before them. No conflict of interest.
66 posted on
12/09/2016 4:35:16 PM PST by
Paladin2
(No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson