Maureen Dowd writing sensibly and honestly for a change?
What’s the catch?
Is she doing so because she suddenly wishes to be seen as a rebel and iconoclast rather than making yet another appearance with her boringly-typical Demo/Commie party-line apparatchik persona, and she has somehow instinctively figured out that writing truthfully will set her apart from the rest of the pack of NYT fabulists and propagandists?
(I avoid clicking through to the New York Times and other ‘fake news’ sites, so I’m not going to read the rest of the article.)
OK, scrolling down the page I see that it was not written by Mo Do.
I stand corrected.