Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Engedi; Cboldt

Trump did not bring the suit, so I don’t think the justices needed to recuse themselves. Stein has said it was not about Trump, but about ‘honest recounts’, so again I see no reason for the MI Supreme Court justices to recuse themselves just because they were on Trump’s top 20 list of possible Scotus picks.


93 posted on 12/09/2016 8:27:47 AM PST by xzins (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
CJ Young's recusal statement

His reason for recusing himself is

"... in order that the decision made by my colleagues in this case will not be legitimately challenged by base speculation and groundless innuendo by the partisans in this controversy and beyond."

The statement is a good read. He blisters the federal judge who ordered the recount to start.

98 posted on 12/09/2016 8:33:05 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I agree, but the Justices caved.


136 posted on 12/09/2016 9:33:46 AM PST by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson