Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Who has info on this moronic Texas elector who is going to vote Cankles?

I can’t get anything definitive on Texas law, but since Abbot and the Texas GOP haven’t said anything, I gather he is within his right to do so without any penalties whatsoever.


101 posted on 12/09/2016 8:36:57 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: LS; Cboldt

I don’t anything other than the news that he wasn’t supporting Trump.

I have said that a pre-announced faithless elector should be easily replaced. But you are correct. It depends on Texas law. It’s hard to imagine Texas law being fine with faithless electors.

Also, I don’t think the Hamiltonian view of independent electors continued to be relevant once direct voting for presidential candidates, rather than for electors, became the norm. (I think I could argue from the 24th amendment that the direct vote for president is now assumed to be the national norm.)


105 posted on 12/09/2016 8:43:17 AM PST by xzins (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson