That said, gatewaypundit is a "sizzle" site, like the trash tabloid stuff at the grocery checkout. He's worn out his welcome with me, I consider what he composes to be fake news, and don't even bother to read it anymore.
“He’s worn out his welcome with me, I consider what he composes to be fake news,’.......
In this case, what needs questioning. As we know Detroit (without the surrounding communities) is primarily demodummies (union or blacks).
I agree. If it’s not reported elsewhere, it’s more GP fake news.
Washington Post and New York Times are long past their fake news sell-by-dates; leave Jim Hoft alone.
I think Hoft made some mistakes during the election season due to wanting to break news first.
That said, I think he got this story correct.
Here is the link from the Detroit News.
http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/05/recount-unrecountable/95007392/
If you understand the optical scanner problem, this was a counting problem not a voting problem.
Running the voted ballots again and again through the machine creates thinly disguised plausible deniability on the part of those running those inner city precincts.
The easiest “hard to detect” fraud to perpetuate is:
1. registration fraud
2. absentee and mail in ballots
3. miscalculation of votes during the canvass.
I was thrown out of the canvassing on election day. Found out that many of the other poll watchers were in contravention of Nevada State law.