Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith

It does seem that way. If he does not dissolve the order then the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit likely will order him to. State law determines whether a recount occurs.


42 posted on 12/07/2016 8:28:20 AM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76; mrsmith; MarMema

Wow - Stein’s lawyer admits that Stein is not an “aggrieved party”. How can the judge possible rule in their favor?


43 posted on 12/07/2016 8:33:44 AM PST by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

The Appeals Court has already clearly forbade him from going the route of disputing the state’s law.
He has to find something else.
Something the Appeals Court will shoot down, but not be offended by.

After all, he looks the fool for causing a pointless recount that has to be ended without completion.


44 posted on 12/07/2016 8:35:11 AM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

Whether the recount CONTINUES you mean.


95 posted on 12/07/2016 11:09:37 AM PST by MarMema ("you can't make up...a constitutional right to a recount" Beloved Mi AG Bill Schuette)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson