“FACT: You can’t refute the information regarding Clinton’s association with the arming of ISIL”
Never tried, it’s beside the point.
“FACT: You can’t refute the truth that ISIL is documented to be involved in human trafficking.”
Never tried, it’s beside the point.
“FACT: Nobody, except you, really gives a shyte whether those indisputable revelations came from Wiki Leaks, Judicial Watch, Alex Jones - or the Tooth Fairy.”
I don’t care either, because all of that is beside the point of the conversation. This conversation is only about the false rumor about the NYPD investigating this “pizzagate” stuff. You might want to twist the conversation elsewhere, but I have no interest in the rest of the incidental stuff you decided to seize on to wriggle your way out of talking about the main point. You can go on talking to yourself about all that, I suppose, but if you keep bringing it up to me, I’m just going to keep telling you that it’s beside the point.
Once again that’s the conversation you’d like to focus your delusion upon.
Meanwhile, despite your distraction, other folks are interested in thinking and learning about how this “pizza” lingo ties into the behavior of the good ol’ boy club operating in D.C.
This is thought-stimulating, for example:
[Day 40 - Where is Eric Braverman?]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vbhni75jYio&feature=youtu.be&t=3m2s
What would an organized crime family do when they talk about moving contraband items in the clear?
Maybe they'd use a code. Maybe, to make the code simple, they'd reuse the same code words depending upon the context of the illegal activity they’re engaged in.
Maybe, to obfuscate things for outsides, they'd even use the code words when talking about legal activity... as well.