Not trolling. just trying to show some otherwise well-interned people that the “evidence” they have would never begin to sustain a verdict of guilt in any court. In fact, 99% would not be admissible.
Regarding my knowledge of a criminal act, no problem. All my former partners know. In addition, when it all becomes public, you will realize you knew 90% of it too.
Hint: Read “Weeping in the Playtime of Others” by Kenneth Wooden, and then read the book “Failsafe.” Check the bios of the authors, Eugene Burdick and Harvey Wheeler, and it will quickly become obvious who the characters in the book are so clearly patterned after. Like most fiction books, the characters are very real. It’s what they do that is fictionalized.
Then look at the quiet nuances of one of the character, plus a big news story of a dozen + years ago, and it all comes together.
You’ll enjoy the “pursuit of knowledge.”
When he dies, I will publish proof I have of a VERY senior former US diplomat who was involved in such conduct and how that conduct helped lead to the Hostage Crisis in Tehran. He no longer engages in such conduct12/6/2016, 9:25:53 PM · 102 of 180
Strac6 to TimeofReason
But you dismissed as non-existant photos he talked about- that have been posted here.
You went beyond ‘carefully questioning evidence’