Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roostercogburn

“LANSING — The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the Board of State Canvassers never should have allowed a recount requested by Green Party candidate Jill Stein to proceed, because she has no chance to overturn the result of the presidential election in her favor and is not an aggrieved candidate.

The panel ordered the board to “reject the November 30, 2016 petition of candidate Stein that precipitated the current recount process.”

The ruling came out almost simultaneously with a 2-1 order from the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals which upheld U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith’s Monday order that the recount must get under way at noon that day, which it did.

The combined effect of the two rulings appears to set up further court proceedings in front of Goldsmith.”

http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/06/trump-schuette-michigan-recount-election/95048550/


43 posted on 12/06/2016 4:13:48 PM PST by randita (PLEASE STOP ALL THE WORTHLESS VANITIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: randita
And Federal District Court Demonrat Whore Goldsmith is specifically on notice fro the Sixth District Federal Court of Appeals above him that they expect his ruling to conform with Michigan state court rulings from the Michigan State Court of Appeals which has ordered an end to there count. Any further foot dragging can be disposed of by the Michigan Supreme Court which has TWO of Trump's listed choices for SCOTUS: Chief Justice Robert Young and Associate Justice Jean Larsen.

Game, set, match! ---------

163 posted on 12/06/2016 5:03:17 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society. Rack 'em, Danno!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: randita
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the Board of State Canvassers never should have allowed a recount requested by Green Party candidate Jill Stein to proceed, because she has no chance to overturn the result of the presidential election in her favor and is not an aggrieved candidate.

Nice job by the state's lawyers. Watched it earlier and that was the line they took.

214 posted on 12/06/2016 5:32:46 PM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson