Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: phoneman08

“Most likely, the district judge will not dissolve his order until an appeal to the MI Supreme Court is handed down.”

So, Stein’s smart move is to not appeal to the MI Supreme Court unless the state asks Goldsmith to vacate his order. Until then, the recount can continue. When Goldsmith is asked to vacate, then she appeals to the state Supreme Court. She can play for time.


245 posted on 12/06/2016 5:53:04 PM PST by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: damper99
And now here is the good news. Her play for time may cause her to have to pay for the recount.

retroactive baby, let it fly!

247 posted on 12/06/2016 5:56:31 PM PST by MarMema (thank you President elect Trump for all you have done!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

To: damper99

MI will pay a visit to Goldsmith tomorrow - at which point Stein’s lawyers will indicate that they will appeal today’s decision - to which Goldsmith will respond by refusing to vacate his order. Then Stein et al can drag their feet on their way to an appeal.


248 posted on 12/06/2016 5:58:24 PM PST by avkillick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

To: damper99

Hard to keep up, and even harder for a layman lie myself to understand, but I did read that the Michigan AG is petitioning the District Judge ASAP.

I think she will appeal to the Michigan SC in order to give Goldsmith a reason to not dissolve his “count till I say” ruling.


255 posted on 12/06/2016 6:06:48 PM PST by phoneman08 (qwiyrqweopigradfdzcm,.dadfjl,dz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson