[Pearls Before Swine]

Jill Stein lacks standing as she is not properly aggrieved, nor has she exhausted all appropriate avenues of redress at the state level.

I agree. I'm glad you used the phrase "properly aggrieved."

I listened to the last 2/3 of the Federal Court appeal of the Stein/Michigan recount today. A lot of the argument centered around the fact that the statute didn't define "aggrieved." So, Jill's lawyer argued that anyone could just say they were aggrieved. One of the judges made a comment about this being form over substance, but nobody talked about a "properly" standard that validates being aggrieved.

[freeandfreezing]

You mean to say “the Michigan State Court” appeal.