It has to be played out. Part of the problem is that WI and to a lesser extent MI did not require any proof of a problem with the canvassing. PA did and that is why Stein dropped her suit in PA and went running to the federal courts. As someone noted above, the fact that the judge scheduled 3 days out in a highly time-sensitive matter is an indication of what he thinks of this suit. I read parts of it and it is the most juvenile legal writing I have ever seen. A lawyer friend said the judge should award court costs and attorney fees to the defendants without them even asking - it’s that bad. And also sanction the Stein team for abusing the federal court system and have the marshals toss them out the front door.
Not only that, but there is no evidence at all to support their positions regarding hacking of voting machines. The very DHS document their affidavit cites says the opposite of what they say it does. They cite to attempts to access voter registration databases in Arizona and Illinois as evidence of an "illegal" election in Pennsylvania. That kind of logic is usually associated with the Art Bell show, not a legal brief.
I will bet a Whopper that EVERY state in the USA is looking long & hard at their laws regarding recounts.
The listed price of $125 per precinct isn’t enough to count for more than about 12 hours. The taxpayers shouldn’t be on the hook for all this nonsense.
I sincerely hope someone from Michigan sues Stein for all those costs.