Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheTimeOfMan

“Isn’t all of the govt under fers? Which is not a defined benefit plan.”

You are right. FERS is a defined contribution plan. I too assumed that pretty much the entire Federal workforce is under FERS. Postal workers and some others may be treated differently.


21 posted on 12/06/2016 3:09:17 PM PST by ChessExpert (It's not compassion when you use government to give other people's money away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: ChessExpert

The Tennessee Valley Authority, a federal entity, has its own retirement system, the TVARS. Which is grossly underfunded like most government pension programs. But it is not subject to the same rules that dictate funding levels for the pension plans in the private sector so they get away with it.


24 posted on 12/06/2016 3:11:56 PM PST by meyer (There is no political solution to this troubling evolution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: ChessExpert

Yes, FERS has a defined contribution (i.e., 401K plan) element. But in addition to this they also have a traditional pension plan which includes regular Cost of Living increases.


27 posted on 12/06/2016 3:19:23 PM PST by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: ChessExpert

Postal workers are under FERS. And they are under the Thrift savings plan.


51 posted on 12/06/2016 4:42:10 PM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: ChessExpert

Employees who started before 1984 can still be CSRS plan, instead of the newer FERS.


73 posted on 12/07/2016 6:42:38 PM PST by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson