To: Ciexyz
The worst case scenario is that the precincts in which ballots were stuffed don't get recounted, but all others do.
This could mean Clinton getting even more votes even though there is evidence that the Democrats were more likely guilty of fraud than the Republicans.
Another case of Friedman's Law of Unintended Consequences.
To: who_would_fardels_bear
I would think she’d get less votes, if the ballot stuffing was done in a district she had won.
24 posted on
12/06/2016 9:21:10 AM PST by
WildHighlander57
((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
To: who_would_fardels_bear
Not gonna happen.
Both candidates will gain and lose roughly the same amount of votes as we’re seeing in WI.
What’s the point of this stupid recount?
25 posted on
12/06/2016 9:21:10 AM PST by
goldstategop
((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
To: who_would_fardels_bear
Please clarify what you said:
Stuffed votes for her are not counted=more votes for her.
I missed something.
31 posted on
12/06/2016 9:23:20 AM PST by
del4hope
(My tagline was hijacked in 2008)
To: who_would_fardels_bear; johniegrad
Explained in post #48. Thank you johniegrad.
55 posted on
12/06/2016 9:37:21 AM PST by
del4hope
(My tagline was hijacked in 2008)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson