Not sure I do either, but as of now, the case is still scheduled for hearing in MI on Tuesday. The MI AG has petitioned the state Supremes to take it up. Stein and the rest of her merry band of commies are requesting of a Federal judge that a two day waiting period to begin the recount is umreasonable. Since the Board of Canvassers is deadlocked 2-2 on the recount, it in theory can go forward but per state law, can’t start until Wed morning. In the meantime, if the Mich SC throws out the case, the point is moot, until of course she claims that federal due process laws were violated. Still, it’s much ado about nothing. It’s irritating, but the Feds are not ordering a recount, just may rule on when it can start. However, I doubt a federal judge will rule on anything before the state would.
There is great hope that the Mi SC will toss it. It is not something we can spend money on right now. 5-2 republican court.
We have Flint, Detroit, and an aging pipeline under the Mackinaw bridge.
Which is why Michiganders are coming together on this on the local news sites. 4-12 million estimated.
From the Michigan Supreme Court roster of filings:
MI Supreme Court
"Recount Lawsuits Pleadings filed with the Michigan Court of Appeals and Michigan Supreme Court pertaining to the presidential recount lawsuits will be posted to this location as they are docketed:
Attorney General v Board of State Canvassers (MSC No. 154862; COA No. 335947)
AG's complaint for writ of mandamus in Court of Appeals
AG's brief in support of complaint in Court of Appeals
AG's motion for immediate consideration in the Court of Appeals
AG's bypass application in the Supreme Court AG's motion for immediate consideration in the Supreme Court
Donald J Trump v Board of State Canvassers (MSC No. 154868; COA No. 335958)
Donald Trump's complaint for mandamus and injunctive relief in the Court of Appeals
Donald Trump's motion for immediate consideration in the Court of Appeals
Donald Trump's bypass application in the Supreme Court Donald Trump's motion for immediate consideration in the Supreme Court