[StAnDeliver]

"She and her attorneys know they have little to no chance of getting relief from the Federal Courts. Even an Obama judge would demand some prima facia evidence of fraud or tabulation error before ruling in her favor (she has acknowledged she has NONE). Also, the state of Pennsylvania has done nothing unconstitutional to her.

There is no justification for the Federal Courts to get involved in her case - no violation of her rights and no violations of Federal Laws in the state dealing with her.

Bada boom bada bing, the Constitution is a beautiful thing.

The GP is just playing out their thin rope, ya'll. "For eleventy million dollars, we took our case to the courts." And accomplished nothing other than certifying President Trump did indeed win WI, MI, PA, and about 57 other states.

[dsm69]

Bada boom bada bing, the Constitution is a beautiful thing.

Yes it is!!!

The GP is just playing out their thin rope, ya'll. "For eleventy million dollars, we took our case to the courts." And accomplished nothing other than certifying President Trump did indeed win WI, MI, PA, and about 57 other states.

Yes, they are just raising money off of this and know full well the Fed Judge will throw their petition out. One other reason the Federal Courts will likely not intervene in her case is that she did not exhaust all her options at the state level. She pulled out of her Monday hearing before Pennsylvania's commonwealth court due to her failing to post a $1 million bond.

Federal Courts do not like to get involved in state issues where the petitioner has not exhausted all options within the state level to remedy their situation before seeking relief from Fedeal Courts.