Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: upchuck; Strac6; bushwon; Ray76; WellyP; MayflowerMadam

Here’s their complaint:

http://www.protectourelections.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Complaint.pdf


104 posted on 12/04/2016 3:33:46 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies ('45 will be the best ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

A collection of unsubstantiated allegations and conclusory statements.


105 posted on 12/04/2016 3:42:34 PM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies; upchuck; bushwon; Ray76; WellyP; MayflowerMadam

Don’t have time to review the whole thing, but on quick review, that is a total BS complaint.

There is no documentation for most allegations. For example, the supposed 25,000 but not received ballots. Never make an allegation in a Complaint that you do not have some arguable proof of.

The core allegations seems to be that the results were not as the pollsters predicted. That’s why they have elections.

I can see this in the future:

(in oral argument to the appeals court)

“Your Honors, in this case, as originally brought in the 7th Judicial District, we were represented by attorney Sylvain Robitaille. That is not only grounds for appeal however.”


107 posted on 12/04/2016 7:49:36 PM PST by Strac6 (Sig Sauer, Pilatus, Mrs. Strac... all the fun things in my life are Swiss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson