Law needs to be changed. Unless you can show some likelihood that it will change the outcome, no recount, period. Stein is not an aggrieved party here, she will still lose no matter what the recount results are.
“The elections board was split along party lines.”
Michigan law already requires that the person demanding a recount show some reason to believe they would win. But when has the law stopped Democrats from grabbing power?
“Aside from the fact that Stein has stated publicly that she has no evidence of wrongdoing in the vote-counting process, she has not been “aggrieved” as a matter of law because she has no possible chance of winning Michigan’s electoral votes in a recount. Because she does not meet this statutory prerequisite, this Court should order the State Defendants to reject it.
Michigan law allows a candidate who has been “aggrieved on account of fraud or mistake in the canvass of votes” to seek a recount. MCL 168.879(1)(b) ...In the circumstances here, Stein could not possibly have been “aggrieved” by any heretofore unidentified fraud or mistake...Accordingly, Stein has suffered no loss or injury from any supposed irregularities in the canvass of votes; she has not been “aggrieved” as MCL 168.879(1)(b) requires.”
But of course, those things only apply when Republicans want something.
[Stein is not an aggrieved party here, she will still lose no matter what the recount results are.]
Tbe communist greenies are funded by HRC and Soros and are attempting to slow walk the vote to force the rino Congress to elect their choice.Michigan may be robbed of the electorial votes if the recount goes past the deadline in December and derail the Michigan elecoral college from voting at all. They hope to take away Trump electors and destroy our Constitution under the evil HRC. The left must be destroyed and removed from any government power as they are communists to the core and hate America and use the dysfunctional underecucated public school systems to brainwash the children, much as Hitler did in the 1930’s.