Replies

I don’t know when was the last time that Politico updated its number’s, but Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections (my go-to website on the subject, with detailed info going back to 1789, and with the added bonus of using the traditional party colors (blue for Republicans and commie red for Democrats) has Hillary’s statewide lead in NV at 27,202 and her Clark County lead at 82,170. http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/ If the level of Democrat fraud is anywhere near that at which was hinted in the article, then the state was stolen in the presidential election and in the elections for the U.S. Senate, at least one U.S. House seat and probably many state legislative seats.

But the article is so poorly written (and edited, with clear inaccuracies left in), and provides so little actual evidence, that I don’t know what to make of all this. I always take stuff that Newsmax publishes with a grain of salt, but trying to glean the truth from this particular article would force one to risk heart disease from the wheelbarrows full of salt that would be required. The article quotes Megan Barth (A reporter? It doesn’t explain) as saying that Nevada had voted for the presidential winner for the past 108 years prior to this year (not exactly, since the state voted for losers William Jennings Bryan in 1908 and Gerald Ford in 1976) and referred to Senator (and incoming Attorney General) Jeff Sessions as “Jeff Session.” State Assembly District 15 GOP nominee Stan Vaughan claims that dozens of movie stars were registered to vote in the district, but they well could be persons who share those names. And Vaughan indicates that the USPS returned as undeliverable mail 9,000+ letters that he sent to the addresses listed with the voter registrations, and Vaughan claims that 185 of the 200 that he checked had voted, but the article doesn’t explain if they had voted after having their ballot mailed to them at the registered address (which would be impossible if the USPS was not delivering mail to such addresses as written) or if they voted in person. And the article merely notes that Secretary of State Barbara (who is a conservative Republican elected in the 2014 GOP landslide and no shrinking violet) had referred Vaughan’s allegations to the Clark County elections board without explaining why that was or whether Cegavske also investigated the allegation or also referred the information to another investigator (such as conservative Republican state Attorney General Adam Laxalt). Frankly, the article seems like a hatchet job without proper research or editing, which is counterproductive when its goal was to expose massive election fraud.

I hope that a more responsible news source follows up on this story so that we can gauge whether indeed there was large-scale election fraud in Nevada. The Democrats’ margins in NV were narrow enough that even medium-scale fraud would have tipped the election to them.