Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

If the firearms are the danger, why would you exempt law enforcement? When all is said and done, a member of law enforcement is far more likely to draw and use a firearm than the average CCW holder.

So, what, you’re saying you’re scared of your customers?

I must have missed that part in business school in discussing how to attract and keep customers.

Let’s be honest with what this really is about - it is about appeasing a group of ‘concerned citizens’ (gun grabbers) in making it more and more difficult or awkward to lawfully carry a concealed weapon. It is making a wide and diverse map of locations where it isn’t ‘welcome.’ Because every CCW holder who carries and prevents crime (or even worse in their book, never touches their firearm at all..) is yet another prime example of their lies.


11 posted on 12/01/2016 10:39:23 AM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


From the letter:

“Recently, we had an incident in one of our stores where a gun inadvertently went off, injuring the customer who was carrying it.”


101 posted on 12/02/2016 10:36:26 AM PST by Rio (Deplorable-American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson