Directly from the OP: "Attorneys for her campaign called several witnesses to support their claim that hackers might have launched a cyber attack or planted malicious software that changed the outcome of the race."
(emphasis mine)
"hackers" and "Or planted malicious software" is exactly what I am talking about. This is not a distinction without a difference.
That said, I've made myself clear that I think Stein is a loony and I think this is a huge waste of time and money, but that's what liberals and statists do best - spend other people's money.
I also think that it is much more likely any fraud would benefit the democrats and be of their doing.
The “russian hacker” cant plant malicious software because they cannot hack into the equipment as there is no internet connection to do so. So this avenue of corruption is gone because it never existed.
There were no russian hackers that were in wisconsin to physically have time alone with the actual voting machines on an individual basis in 3000 different wards, and somehow change the code, then change it back afterwards so it could not be detected.
What I am telling you what she is alleging is not possible.
Am done replying to ya.
I agree with your last sentence. :)