Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eleutheria5

Thanks for asking. Things like this:

https://www.nraila.org/issues/internationalun-gun-control-issues/

International & United Nations Gun Control

NRA has been engaged at the United Nations and elsewhere internationally in response to overreaching small arms initiatives for two decades. During this time, we have been actively opposing transnational efforts that would limit Americans’ Second Amendment freedoms. NRA has been a recognized Non-Governmental Organization at the United Nations since 1996. Our status as an NGO allows us to closely monitor the internal UN debate over firearm issues and report back to our members.

The most pressing international threat to U.S. gun owners is the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). Among its most egregious provisions, the treaty encourages national recordkeeping requirements for “end users” of covered arms (including firearms), and suggests that national governments share such records. Further, the ATT compels countries to make arms import and export decisions based upon a trading partner’s willingness to abide by the treaty’s requirements, which could isolate the United States from legitimate trade in arms or force it to adopt restrictions detrimental to Second Amendment rights. During the drafting phase, NRA vigorously advocated for civilian firearm ownership be removed from the treaty’s scope. Those recommendations were ignored, meaning U.S. firearms policy could become the rest of the world’s business and subject to its approval, on pain of trade restrictions if it doesn’t meet “international norms.”

Secretary of State John Kerry signed the ATT on behalf of the U.S. on September 25, 2013. NRA continues to work with its Senate allies to prevent ratification or implementation of the treaty in the U.S.


49 posted on 11/29/2016 4:49:35 AM PST by nralife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: nralife

I can picture Donald’s response to these international initiatives: .l.. ..l. An SOS would have to implement that two-fingered response, even if he himself was for it.


50 posted on 11/29/2016 4:59:31 AM PST by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: nralife

Trump needs someone for SecState who can cut through all the bullcrap and fix the department. Like everything else a rat touches, State is seriously broken and needs to be gutted and rebuilt. Can Petraeus do that?

It’s the same thing with every department. Everything in Washington is broken and Trump needs to put not just loyalists there, but people who can gut everything and rebuild.


54 posted on 11/29/2016 5:06:31 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Election 2016 - Best election ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson